From miroslav.rovis1@zg.ht.hr Tue May 12 14:24:30 2015 Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:24:30 +0200 From: miroslav.rovis1@zg.ht.hr To: dng@lists.dyne.org Cc: James Powell Subject: Re: [Dng] Systemd discussions at LinuxQuestions. Message-ID: <20150512122430.GA7014@g0n> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Mutt-References: X-Mutt-Fcc: =Sent X-Mutt-PGP: S<0x4FBAF0AE> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Status: RO Content-Length: 3350 Lines: 86 --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 02:17:08PM -0700, James Powell wrote: > Unfortunately the moderators at LinuxQuestions have closed off discussing= the Devuan stance topic that had been open and participate in over the rep= eated squabbling, though honestly, very little was done other than the peop= le who seemed offended by the choice of Devuan's developers lack of choice = of systemd, and unwillingness to stop asking about funding and other repeat= edly defended arguments which turned the discussion of Devuan into a defens= e of Devuan. > Hi James! It would have made sense pasting in your message the address on LQ of that = discussion, else, the burden is on everyone curious to know where that disc= ussion might be to perform the same search. In other words, you would have spared a few people the duck-ing (http://duc= kduckgo.com) for that remaining information (ducking for info; don't recomm= end google the surveillors to anybody ever; strictly my opinion). Like this, it remains very incomplete. Just saying. Have no time to discuss this or search for it myself and give = to everybody the missing address.=20 I have to go, because I have another message to write to this ML. Thank you! > Just to make it known, the LQ staff have not taken kindly to systemd topi= cs since many of the pro-systemd crowd seem to act more in attacking the st= ance of being anti-systemd rather than the principles of being anti-systemd= for software sanity reasons. Very little real discussion of systemd's meri= ts and technicals (if topics even can be soundly made) ever seems to go any= where due to the crowd there. >=20 > This is unfortunate but due to the fact several staff members are from th= e pro-systemd camp, and the fact the staff have made their decisions on tho= se topics, any discussion is probably going to continually go in that same = direction, and topics will go nowhere on that forum when that topic is brou= ght up. >=20 > I though I'd let you all know before going to the LinuxQuestions topic an= d finding it locked out. >=20 > -Jim >=20 > Sent from my Windows Phone > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng --=20 Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVUfD+AAoJEOqYhIhPuvCuK/4P/07LiV6tQJ/5gT1pbctePxts DVB8hEwZqA+de4ztzAe46GmEyT4conPTpx9kw38xQSQYTCIkQqBMwSlJNKoiquda 26RkjoFZk7JCrwaf2yfie2DWLdRJ3ya8m4QpdssZDwxHqvaRwTxRLgd0gmLVwF3O XnZhtP4Azjs1DqtFUwM292D0/CAGVBwI7YLbNjcClL5xGH5ebJl3B5969BO2/q7Z Y3cNfLeqMiZH3JeBIskMld0qEEpw7OjOf7pEG9NZehn9huYYI/U8ZUS8YHsGSSAp t2qGpxfFqg5f9xWx7xiQXRhjZNH7jQlvJVTtS7fIFZL2213Lf9CwzrDSDN1vMa3u hA72rAzB4Hd92lSt86jcPhDrIFuvrLoaw1PlB+PDMEbtZDxXvweR1XnGOz//ToFa aO6NSPCK54kyWRJ5P35RBFM3IFj5JdAUiznIYP3Ik9L8fqkN4/E7a86XnCIpg7Lq PKGWyxk5LmVbBdvXL2sXUe7ks858pwMQKZnXH7dkE/mqVzldcn+BQX9i1b6BYZ0B BVxKOo5eMnV7B9MBW+cXKfipQMcIkc6Obtt9DlTdXw/AEgcypsjycMcfaaqJIZAf ELBlUkPig5xkma8PaaYxAzXXn8KrYIQMhy4qQRKDd7hwcsL8UWcNV1z31t6mvy3o 6x6Ze3Xq2Cf6f6SJf0Zw =OYNl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG--