From lurker-index@localhost Sun Sep 18 13:06:36 2016 Return-Path: Received: from lin16.mojsite.com (178.218.164.164:993) by g0n.xdwgrp with IMAP4-SSL; 18 Sep 2016 11:06:36 -0000 Envelope-to: miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr Delivery-date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 09:06:12 +0200 Received: from shtjevan.gbnet.net ([194.70.142.36]:62951 helo=gbnet.net) by lin16.mojsite.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1blWAx-0006Sw-7d for miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 09:06:07 +0200 Received: (qmail 11508 invoked by uid 611); 18 Sep 2016 07:03:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 11419 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2016 07:02:02 -0000 Received: from mail-1.fido.net (84.246.192.5) by shtjevan.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 18 Sep 2016 07:02:02 -0000 Received: from schplaf.org ([80.67.188.118] helo=morgoth.schplaf.org) by mail-1.fido.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1blW6x-0008BZ-P2 for mutt-users@mutt.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 08:02:01 +0100 Received: by morgoth.schplaf.org (Postfix, from userid 5002) id 1D13D28A; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 08:37:53 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on morgoth.schplaf.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0, No Received: from lovelace.schplaf (125.rev4.ldn-fai.net [80.67.188.125]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: slash) by morgoth.schplaf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47FC7F8 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 08:37:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 08:43:28 +0200 From: Jean-Christophe Bach To: mutt-users@mutt.org Message-ID: <20160918064328.ts37vzdr6ehds6ln@lovelace.schplaf> References: <20160917232509.GK31239@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160918051503.GO31239@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160918061803.4077.03047CF5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qbw27l5jyn3uxdal" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160918061803.4077.03047CF5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE9324BDEC124FF27 X-IM-Jabber: jcb@im.schplaf.org X-WebSite: http://www.schplaf.org X-Operating-System: A real one: Gentoo Linux User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2 (2016-06-11) X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIdbPuQjQhlEHM2e+a3MZ8ctbZUwvO9wqRY4OgelZCK5cx1wTMkEUUoeb KIhkyzl2dMyHM/lQINdtG8vrH1tD/1GHchG7UCGe+hbk6hFMPZazrhTg/4q2QU37a0WxDeSOQqEi O55Lt1OfX4Q2NNU2iRID/AGC3RFugPW11HIScqQgISimHpAo9jO+doIgCqhbv/gMk1BpbrZTTNyD zly6+mAccBIk1Sag4dKiqCrF8eZZBk6HpfuyBvXsTkPMT38gZ8dRwT5c0pI1Go+Ti1E5LF7i3h3w mAJHhB5TDWVnLs8FFpmtMuO56q7BznSN6SugFMOpyKA69LF1Ge2GaGfxmfrQuMYAAwF5f/XA3e/q xFlkeyNAu+TGy4S13Qpcc/K5CGReSdkbj51gB8ZMj8t/+kHPaHMyqcul/+IgNy0t/W2ylnEaTdft T8Kul6ZpNgSqNH06rIM6ClqDToHTLIJs0/eIwLzRWNJ5cyPxQaCa99or/cuW/PWBpXnkmCA6bOjS sG6FRHh5k0PrubRSCSbv0dc= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@master.fido.net Subject: =?utf-8?b?W1NQQU0/XQ==?= Re: OT: Miro's PGP signature [Was: urlview not listing the links right] X-FidoGuard-Class: unsure X-FidoGuard-Evidence: Combined (0.80) X-Recommended-Action: accept List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users" Precedence: bulk Sender: owner-mutt-users@mutt.org X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-ID: 1blWAx-0006Sw-7d X-PlusHosting-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1.799, required 5, BAYES_05 -0.50, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.00, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1.00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.30) X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-From: owner-mutt-users-m24726@mutt.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= --qbw27l5jyn3uxdal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, > Can anyone else verify Miro's signature? I'm getting "BAD signature" > both in mutt, and when I extract the signed part and try to verify it > with gpg from the command line. >=20 > mutt 1.5.24, gpg 2.0.28, libgcrypt 1.7.3. >=20 > This just happened to me on another mailing list too, so I strongly > suspect it is me and not the senders. The signature appears as BAD here too (with mutt-1.7.0-r4, gnupg-2.0.28, libgcrypt 1.7.3). JC --qbw27l5jyn3uxdal Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJX3jeQAAoJEOkyS97BJP8nnzoQAL/0m83rJinKmMTuD2RwlhnO GB6ca4oi8PpERfe9+8xHMWkG9Ei0q39ayCyRlZbJJIwPqbtkpfzsFGOkdc+fapxV P443muOohihhNHq5SnpJOYhkd5JDopvAabDRMPYvWtWzV/xdBX0zQV4XfMm7LOiN aJO1cc/iyqYrlUuPTtV9PiARX487Q4IVZdFdqTUtWqHxcYTf8xkh6ii+8JXKt9mc FMCbVGLGOncffQRiXh9uS5D0rU7j4NDnJEnrBFtsg15uTYd+ZoCsI4b8KvZ3NTH4 Xo1iswfL5+gFNzkBdExCkXOFUfkdTXcUGtIcBjUTsv5hYFEV80yFP7jcGMdm61np 5N/b21aCKbthlBJB0bbkBMvKG/K4cYhvDT679Hj8j1aYe3X+syoiKeHlqbz7esCX AbfbqcH61TSjcz6g0Rtsbzq3TlvbBiyz9wvW8rSkrlt54+VCt0jBohushNamcmVu vfo0FTnGWu5pKeeu7VLBYj0tJ9dw1uBhnqgIPALfPKaiIDwKTC0qU/xTOnEmKKDF ovSKiAaPPT7UC+16YeOehjgvhojY/ru6oJLeRGTF7GkDoBJlCnGW1nLQ35Xi/olT b2gIPHysXCugm7+oj9sGtuiuHLu2Hzbs7itosmbL/p+Ys9Nc18xrwugPgJSLoamA bmyKSo+ssSRMUH41Fnsx =Tk+0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qbw27l5jyn3uxdal--