From lurker-index@localhost Sun Sep 18 13:06:36 2016
Return-Path: <owner-mutt-users-M24727@mutt.org>
Received: from lin16.mojsite.com (178.218.164.164:993) by g0n.xdwgrp with
  IMAP4-SSL; 18 Sep 2016 11:06:36 -0000
Envelope-to: miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr
Delivery-date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 09:52:07 +0200
Received: from shtjevan.gbnet.net ([194.70.142.36]:64845 helo=gbnet.net)
	by lin16.mojsite.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.87)
	(envelope-from <owner-mutt-users-M24727@mutt.org>)
	id 1blWtJ-0006JS-Ag
	for miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 09:51:57 +0200
Received: (qmail 14278 invoked by uid 611); 18 Sep 2016 07:48:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 14240 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2016 07:47:56 -0000
Received: from davin.gbnet.net (194.70.142.37)
  by shtjevan.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 18 Sep 2016 07:47:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 28866 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2016 07:46:30 -0000
Received: from mail-1.fido.net (84.246.192.5)
  by davin.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 18 Sep 2016 07:46:30 -0000
Received: from wp254.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.133.23])
	by mail-1.fido.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.85)
	(envelope-from <lists@2ion.de>)
	id 1blWo1-0002PC-0o
	for mutt-users@mutt.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 08:46:30 +0100
Received: from 124x38x87x107.ap124.ftth.ucom.ne.jp ([124.38.87.107] helo=localhost); authenticated
	by wp254.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	id 1blWny-0004u5-Rx; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 09:46:27 +0200
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:46:23 +0900
From: lists@2ion.de
To: mutt-users@mutt.org
Subject: Re: OT: Miro's PGP signature [Was: urlview not listing the links
 right]
Message-ID: <20160918074623.GA27629@loopback>
References: <20160917232509.GK31239@g0n.xdwgrp>
 <20160918051503.GO31239@g0n.xdwgrp>
 <20160918061803.4077.03047CF5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160918061803.4077.03047CF5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;lists@2ion.de;1474184789;93a5ad9a;
Received-SPF: pass (mail-1.fido.net: domain of 2ion.de designates 80.237.133.23 as permitted sender) client-ip=80.237.133.23; envelope-from=lists@2ion.de; helo=wp254.webpack.hosteurope.de;
X-SPF-Result: mail-1.fido.net: domain of 2ion.de designates 80.237.133.23 as permitted sender
X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIbAts96AqmkyOFarX0AoHsiV2MUMi6NaabhX7TSdFNOHuT2Rlx1BChyF
 tSOPv9x/GsRdlqTGdzRxl/tUNppzKE50hZJH0Q4yY3hZpJhanREFDSfj8mdfM1oq6my97seJHVQn
 3tJ9fXNnpVrqhAHqK2RtfPZ0moRme6gw2baMrVC47QsnEG/a/l5scf1Fs/ttQYPYYa+d0XusiUOY
 TXPmHtq9JZm29VuN6PFmb2HndDdRUV8ShebT8U8Xw9HTDfreWS4y8ne9usSd0RFsfnP3wvVGJWOt
 eWaoXFvbbwb3Cge72jFzs5Bu7E1Y/gY6WS7godtLi1QVVyztjxnWvpW5S+Nm/Ht0X34reon5ybTm
 YbQL72bVY3BSbCzntPMWC5ocW2myHnrEu4z1sC6Rab9KGqvARctald6MT7i39qIzRdObXbEB6/iO
 r9DMp93DWOYJR5fEn53ejfuSOHsLWrcSOPuJp6jlJYslcIyTcGPwlG9SnbTogW6Q0Ps7+hDStj0g
 7661jXL6U0oyoyo+sKpAAYefSqmvSdUH+HBNICr0FFSC
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@master.fido.net
Authentication-Results: fido.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists@2ion.de
X-FidoGuard-Class: ham
X-FidoGuard-Evidence: Combined (0.10)
X-Recommended-Action: accept
List-Post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
List-Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
Precedence: bulk
Sender: owner-mutt-users@mutt.org
X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-ID: 1blWtJ-0006JS-Ag
X-PlusHosting-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
	score=-1.799, required 5, BAYES_05 -0.50,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.00, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1.00,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.30)
X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-From: owner-mutt-users-m24727@mutt.org
X-Spam-Status: No
X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?=

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 11:21:33PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> Can anyone else verify Miro's signature?  I'm getting "BAD signature"
> both in mutt, and when I extract the signed part and try to verify it
> with gpg from the command line.
> 
> mutt 1.5.24, gpg 2.0.28, libgcrypt 1.7.3.
> 
> This just happened to me on another mailing list too, so I strongly
> suspect it is me and not the senders.

It appears as valid here. mutt 1.7, gpg 2.1.15, libgcrypt 1.7.3.
