From lurker-index@localhost Mon Sep 19 14:08:44 2016 Return-Path: Received: from lin16.mojsite.com (178.218.164.164:993) by g0n.xdwgrp with IMAP4-SSL; 19 Sep 2016 12:08:44 -0000 Envelope-to: miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr Delivery-date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:47:00 +0200 Received: from shtjevan.gbnet.net ([194.70.142.36]:53516 helo=gbnet.net) by lin16.mojsite.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1blw6A-0007U4-Vy for miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:46:55 +0200 Received: (qmail 29131 invoked by uid 611); 19 Sep 2016 10:44:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 29109 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2016 10:43:17 -0000 Received: from davin.gbnet.net (194.70.142.37) by shtjevan.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 19 Sep 2016 10:43:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 28366 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2016 10:39:59 -0000 Received: from mail-1.fido.net (84.246.192.5) by davin.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 19 Sep 2016 10:39:59 -0000 Received: from zardoc.esmtp.org ([70.36.157.240]) by mail-1.fido.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1blvzP-0006mI-Ag for mutt-users@mutt.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:39:58 +0100 Received: from x2.esmtp.org (localhost. [127.0.0.1]) by zardoc.esmtp.org (MeTA1-1.1.Alpha6.0) with ESMTPS (TLS=TLSv1.2, cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384, bits=256, verify=OK) id S000000000020C76F00; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 03:39:52 -0700 Received: (from ca@localhost) by x2.esmtp.org (8.14.6/8.12.10.Beta0/Submit) id u8JAdqPQ026147 for mutt-users@mutt.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 03:39:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 03:39:52 -0700 From: Claus Assmann To: mutt-users@mutt.org Subject: Re: OT: Miro's PGP signature Message-ID: <20160919103952.GA13914@x2.esmtp.org> Reply-To: mutt-users@mutt.org Mail-Followup-To: mutt-users@mutt.org References: <20160917232509.GK31239@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160918051503.GO31239@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160918061803.4077.03047CF5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160919053542.13563.3494DAB5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160919053542.13563.3494DAB5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24+24 (4de4b3635140) (2015-08-30) X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIZkPdBLoI4rpXXVukOUKyiwMVK2FFy+TmYeRnjy88I2+Wywi3RPeT3mN b5O6yuT+gUzCN0WZSl7cguNkLbh+Ux309qCWqNzocZwcIGp6lcxjZuB+2KJsO3GXVz1P8nrkgH/Y OtGqTc2vmMYcR172Ttilf9FHzkAWuSdBA6ZpRK+22EpgsNVL5BgQIkhMwiP8i/VmK8HeDQmAGXrF KhzdNicB5bf2GcXuUkJN0PE8ct7aCPDKTo6I/NU7fcDpocXu30WEJkIe7Jsq+y0ys/Cptw493SsS 4aMXJmiJ2G0eb5ahfy36Q0y4/ZIEpZ88QYwZ3dh9k/7+ezSIkKvuiCmTMO+fisJCU7/dqfyyzLJt i/St7g6G2ujZu0ohb8Ar3zd3CjHYLyvT6f3Q+BmtUtn7AtuSI+TcSDcfdFUrIheeFYvGqwDRBfGc CitSyoubPUw2INkjyzby4idWI9QDpJuVzLDOJQqAY3yHWg7XcwqMuTIFpl8rF453rlG/1n4zSXbJ j8Z5HU9lWzY9IEW/lO31ercxL7hrJSk60SF3F6RYOYr2 X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@master.fido.net X-FidoGuard-Class: ham X-FidoGuard-Evidence: Combined (0.14) X-Recommended-Action: accept List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users" Precedence: bulk Sender: owner-mutt-users@mutt.org X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-ID: 1blw6A-0007U4-Vy X-PlusHosting-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.199, required 5, BAYES_00 -1.90, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.00, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1.00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.30) X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-From: owner-mutt-users-m24740@mutt.org X-Spam-Status: No X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= On Sun, Sep 18, 2016, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > I switched to gpgme-1.5.5 (up until now I used the classic gpg spawning > interface). Sadly, same results. Just for the fun of it: can you try with gpg 1.4.x? > One thing I learned is that it makes no sense to just dump the signed > MIME part into a file and run gpg --verify; the signature is generated Take a look at the gnupg mailing list: "splitting up an inline-signed OpenPGP message" that thread has a script/program to "convert" a signed mail into the right format for verification, so you could try it to see what went wrong with the mail that you got (and maybe compare it with the same mail stored in some archive?).