From lurker-index@localhost Mon Sep 19 17:06:25 2016 Return-Path: Received: from lin16.mojsite.com (178.218.164.164:993) by g0n.xdwgrp with IMAP4-SSL; 19 Sep 2016 15:06:25 -0000 Envelope-to: miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr Delivery-date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:16:56 +0200 Received: from shtjevan.gbnet.net ([194.70.142.36]:62974 helo=gbnet.net) by lin16.mojsite.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1blzNK-00073F-Fa for miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:16:50 +0200 Received: (qmail 15644 invoked by uid 611); 19 Sep 2016 14:14:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 15572 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2016 14:13:00 -0000 Received: from davin.gbnet.net (194.70.142.37) by shtjevan.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 19 Sep 2016 14:13:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 18172 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2016 14:11:03 -0000 Received: from mail-1.fido.net (84.246.192.5) by davin.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 19 Sep 2016 14:11:03 -0000 Received: from smtp7.plusvps.com ([89.201.164.170]) by mail-1.fido.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1blzHg-000222-GQ for mutt-users@mutt.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 15:11:03 +0100 Received: from lin16.mojsite.com ([178.218.164.164]) by smtp7.plusvps.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1blzHb-0009yC-Dm for mutt-users@mutt.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:10:55 +0200 Received: from 93-138-57-228.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([93.138.57.228]:56086 helo=g0n.localdomain) by lin16.mojsite.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1blzHa-0005u1-Fo; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:10:54 +0200 Received: by g0n.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6C91A43; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:11:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:11:05 +0200 From: Miroslav Rovis To: mutt-users@mutt.org Cc: Darac Marjal Subject: Re: PGP sigs fail verification Message-ID: <20160919141105.GF31779@g0n.xdwgrp> References: <20160917232509.GK31239@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160918051503.GO31239@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160918061803.4077.03047CF5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160919053542.13563.3494DAB5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160919103952.GA13914@x2.esmtp.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ryJZkp9/svQ58syV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160919103952.GA13914@x2.esmtp.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) X-PlusHosting-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details, Found to be clean, Found to be clean X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-SpamCheck: , not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.449, required 5, BAYES_00 -1.90, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.00, KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ 0.75, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1.00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.30) X-Spam-Status: No, No, No X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - lin16.mojsite.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - mutt.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - croatiafidelis.hr X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: lin16.mojsite.com: authenticated_id: miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr X-Authenticated-Sender: lin16.mojsite.com: miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIR2SJy4mPedjCjbCVmstzVxwmVN+qmOsqPA4awzKV+nfEy9+6i+HVSod DWEH1Oag5P0gpBbsmKo2xFYd4cLbfj1iLS35izL9ptKuULkIwwsu0z6bhalFEM/pjPCQA+BAllJw ro3yTLtJuU6ExAwG+yzjzOoDJqiQN2i0euud5jjnzR7/PvNhTcyl6iDYCke1YbHe/g5Nzaj+Cvdc 9PDfoBwo5VycYXtvTrIJkSyLHwHuXPWlFdaGOH191uXjgjQN/W4jTw0cILd7o5RN+VfVmaiWIfx7 2XfVKFoIpfctRbVK4t4d8JgCR4QeUw1lZy7PBRaZrTLjuequwc50jekroBTDqcigOvSxdRnthmhn 8Zn6pjBcJbbIhN3IdQS/6GN7G+KIStnwG6agArbBJGis+KOQAEErZ6BfD4/W227/VzHg+l5ZnOoq S85+o/HqXSJ34L1TzOfBFM7Er/7n1KQSkHuxOWnp1UaerA3HM1DGPLa9aseSo+eTNO7G/rUMG+AW yn7GSOGo5AhqxuJQMN+Ull1jlvMIu+sRZOzqnbOGnKMP X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@master.fido.net X-FidoGuard-Class: ham X-FidoGuard-Evidence: Combined (0.01) X-Recommended-Action: accept List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users" Precedence: bulk Sender: owner-mutt-users@mutt.org X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-ID: 1blzNK-00073F-Fa X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-From: owner-mutt-users-m24742@mutt.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= --ryJZkp9/svQ58syV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I would kindly ask the readers, since this is really not just about my PGP-sig, to accept the above more generally named subject: "Re: PGP sigs fail verification" for this thread, pls. On 160919-03:39-0700, Claus Assmann wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016, Ian Zimmerman wrote: >=20 > > I switched to gpgme-1.5.5 (up until now I used the classic gpg spawning > > interface). Sadly, same results. >=20 > Just for the fun of it: can you try with gpg 1.4.x? >=20 > > One thing I learned is that it makes no sense to just dump the signed > > MIME part into a file and run gpg --verify; the signature is generated >=20 > Take a look at the gnupg mailing list: > "splitting up an inline-signed OpenPGP message" > that thread has a script/program to "convert" a signed mail into > the right format for verification, so you could try it to see what > went wrong with the mail that you got (and maybe compare it with > the same mail stored in some archive?). >=20 Looking that topic up: https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2016-September/031552.html ( the same, just in case: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/devel/77255 ) And I was thinking, is it the 1.4 and the 2.x versions' incompatibility, maybe. I use 1.4 and Ian Zimmerman who uses gpg 2.0.28 couldn't verify my sig, but could verify Ken Moffat's sig. Quite the contrary, I couldn't verify Ken Moffat's sig, but was perfectly able to verify Paul Saunders' sig (as I reported earlier yesterday in this same thread, but the only other one branch (currently)). There are two branches only, in Mutt, of the topic that I had started with the title: "urlview not listing the links right", but the web interface is splitting it wrong... Lurker would be the solution, such as you have it, e.g. all so well displayed: https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/thread/20160919.131920.7c9bf519.en.html#20160= 919.131920.7c9bf519 (and around, and it's a developing thread, will likely/possibly be more to see there, all in as good an order as in Mutt!) I just corrected and expanded what verifies and not in my Mutt in the only other thread in Mutt, and on web it is here: Re: PGP sigs fail verification http://marc.info/?l=3Dmutt-users&m=3D147429312905686&w=3D2 I'm CC'ing this to both Derek D. Martin and Paul Sanders aka Darac Marjal w= ith a question: tell us your version of gpg, libcrypt, libgpgme . Ken Moffat's gpg is 2.1 (found in his mail in this thread). If yours is 1.4 it could be incompatibility btwn 1.4 and 2.x since it will show that mine gpg 1.4 has no issues with both of yours sigs, and I can't verify Ken's gpg 2.1 sig. Regards! --=20 Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr --ryJZkp9/svQ58syV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJX3/H5AAoJEOqYhIhPuvCu6B4P/imUx4LjmT+/8/P+Sfwna5gB VYfsKB+eHtT5+dM8chf7g4VX17S12jIVKesxuHrk3FeO8oZNI7v89wkXHuhn5pyM YMZQrS1vdQ+t+nJPiIuuSBquC9zZdBArZDDRLyiDwXDQNa8ArWc9oAXRF7d0v6nF GUN7+HBSat0oMmD11fwQTKnOOZU+91Y/7gSI7rO5oPnAnM/moYHiKiFxUIqUbxFC SgeI5zC/pRm/GC9fJGz9+IEp8EYckXf2IjNhYzTViVvZXr1d8KfSHAluf+/KMtPS eefoAyG+kUhnisc0PC3Lf79RiNGMhe3q0hqGvzFJsyATunbrKKL/ABEFD8U9htG1 TtKlmjt95kFWE9JmRtFL5APeNmmbS2/bjCJCLX/kIS0SJhgGV1Xx3Ksn96bTsjyx 3krXaM7wZyCbAF78/UwTTHo3X5cpifafoSlwk6Dy0iOq/hpo0TaiGkN6ykJM3MvA p96en/M5kC7a5q7U/CAo6YkAd0FGzUy8+SqadVR7qGQdy000Iuy7ZB93BiyrlTB5 i9lGjUEoQ/RUfVfxmk2WNEiuMQKBo6nURZgxVugLEG2DD7FvQ/2fdC0AxwP+Glwn 8Hr31/BiEDhcS3Ia5hUn2yJPpimKFOMCe44Yim9jJ4y+xtNtcqZ0jhrOoFrEVIkD Fk6FqT4RMbe73kthDB4D =mQ8z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ryJZkp9/svQ58syV--