From lurker-index@localhost Mon Sep 19 21:20:59 2016
Return-Path: <owner-mutt-users-M24747@mutt.org>
Received: from lin16.mojsite.com (178.218.164.164:993) by g0n.xdwgrp with
  IMAP4-SSL; 19 Sep 2016 19:20:58 -0000
Envelope-to: miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr
Delivery-date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 20:13:53 +0200
Received: from shtjevan.gbnet.net ([194.70.142.36]:42353 helo=gbnet.net)
	by lin16.mojsite.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.87)
	(envelope-from <owner-mutt-users-M24747@mutt.org>)
	id 1bm34d-0008QV-03
	for miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 20:13:47 +0200
Received: (qmail 4811 invoked by uid 611); 19 Sep 2016 18:10:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 4738 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2016 18:08:14 -0000
Received: from davin.gbnet.net (194.70.142.37)
  by shtjevan.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 19 Sep 2016 18:08:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 22846 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2016 17:46:22 -0000
Received: from mail-1.fido.net (84.246.192.5)
  by davin.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 19 Sep 2016 17:46:22 -0000
Received: from zardoc.esmtp.org ([70.36.157.240])
	by mail-1.fido.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.86)
	(envelope-from <ca+envelope@esmtp.org>)
	id 1bm2e2-0005XW-W1
	for mutt-users@mutt.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 18:46:21 +0100
Received: from x2.esmtp.org (localhost. [127.0.0.1])
	by zardoc.esmtp.org (MeTA1-1.1.Alpha6.0) with ESMTPS
	(TLS=TLSv1.2, cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384, bits=256, verify=OK)
	id S000000000020CB2300; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:46:16 -0700
Received: (from ca@localhost)
	by x2.esmtp.org (8.14.6/8.12.10.Beta0/Submit) id u8JHkG4G032689
	for mutt-users@mutt.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:46:16 -0700
From: Claus Assmann <mutt+users@esmtp.org>
To: mutt-users@mutt.org
Subject: Re: PGP sigs fail verification
Message-ID: <20160919174616.GA21191@x2.esmtp.org>
Reply-To: mutt-users@mutt.org
Mail-Followup-To: mutt-users@mutt.org
References: <20160917232509.GK31239@g0n.xdwgrp>
 <20160918051503.GO31239@g0n.xdwgrp>
 <20160918061803.4077.03047CF5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>
 <20160919053542.13563.3494DAB5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>
 <20160919103952.GA13914@x2.esmtp.org>
 <20160919164246.15592.34B1187A@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160919164246.15592.34B1187A@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24+24 (4de4b3635140) (2015-08-30)
X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIZkPdBLoI4rpXXVukOUKyiwMVK2FFy+TmYeRnjy88I2+Wywi3RPeT3mN
 b5O6yuT+gUzCN0WZSl7cguNkLbh+Ux309qCWqNzocZwcIGp6lcxjZuB+2KJsO3GXVz1P8nrkgH/Y
 OtGqTc2vmMYcR172Ttilf9FHzkAWuSdBA6ZpRK+22EpgsNVL5BgQIkhMwiP8i710+XWoqywpS64x
 S0hJFCJebq6n9iCeHKvL+7dAcVPGCPDKTo6I/NU7fcDpocXu30WEJkIe7Jsq+y0ys/Cptw493SsS
 4aMXJmiJ2G0eb5ahfy36Q0y4/ZIEpZ88QYwZ3dh9k/7+ezSIkKvuiCmTMO+fisJCU7/dqfyyzLJt
 i/St7g6G2ujZu0ohb8Ar3zd3CjHYLyvT6f3Q+BmtUtn7AtuSI+TcSDcfdFUrIheeFYvGqwDRBfGc
 CitSyoubPUw2INkjyzby4idWI9QDpJuVzLDOJQqAY3yHWg7XcwqMuTIFpl8rF453rlG/1n4zSXbJ
 j8Z5HU9lWzY9IEW/lO31ercxL7hrJSk60SF3F6RYOYr2
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@master.fido.net
X-FidoGuard-Class: ham
X-FidoGuard-Evidence: Combined (0.10)
X-Recommended-Action: accept
List-Post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
List-Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
Precedence: bulk
Sender: owner-mutt-users@mutt.org
X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-ID: 1bm34d-0008QV-03
X-PlusHosting-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
	score=-3.199, required 5, BAYES_00 -1.90,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.00, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1.00,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.30)
X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-From: owner-mutt-users-m24747@mutt.org
X-Spam-Status: No
X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?=

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2016-09-19 03:39, Claus Assmann wrote:

> > went wrong with the mail that you got (and maybe compare it with
> > the same mail stored in some archive?).

> The BADs I see are with multipart/signed emails, like all the signed

So download the same mail from an archive and compare it with the
one that you have on your system. Let us know what you find.
