From lurker-index@localhost Mon Sep 19 21:54:09 2016 Return-Path: Received: from lin16.mojsite.com (178.218.164.164:993) by g0n.xdwgrp with IMAP4-SSL; 19 Sep 2016 19:54:08 -0000 Envelope-to: miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr Delivery-date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:41:41 +0200 Received: from shtjevan.gbnet.net ([194.70.142.36]:45707 helo=gbnet.net) by lin16.mojsite.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bm4Rb-000742-BJ for miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:41:35 +0200 Received: (qmail 10352 invoked by uid 611); 19 Sep 2016 19:38:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 10315 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2016 19:37:42 -0000 Received: from mail-1.fido.net (84.246.192.5) by shtjevan.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 19 Sep 2016 19:37:42 -0000 Received: from disorder-1-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net ([2001:470:1f04:51a::2] helo=acedia.primate.net) by mail-1.fido.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bm4Nk-0005zm-PY for mutt-users@mutt.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 20:37:42 +0100 Received: from acedia.primate.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by acedia.primate.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-4) with ESMTPS id u8JJbUw9021164 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:37:34 -0700 Received: (from itz@localhost) by acedia.primate.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u8JJbPUm021151 for mutt-users@mutt.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:37:25 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: acedia.primate.net: itz set sender to itz@primate.net using -f Received: from [10.8.78.14] (helo=matica.foolinux.mooo.com) by ahiker.mooo.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bm4NX-0006y8-HY for mutt-users@mutt.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:37:23 -0700 Received: from itz by matica.foolinux.mooo.com with local (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bm4NX-0005Pb-Bf for mutt-users@mutt.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:37:23 -0700 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:37:23 -0700 From: Ian Zimmerman To: mutt-users@mutt.org Subject: Re: PGP sigs fail verification Message-ID: <20160919193340.20692.229F9417@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Reply-To: mutt-users@mutt.org Mail-Followup-To: mutt-users@mutt.org References: <20160917232509.GK31239@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160918051503.GO31239@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160918061803.4077.03047CF5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160919053542.13563.3494DAB5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160919103952.GA13914@x2.esmtp.org> <20160919164246.15592.34B1187A@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160919174616.GA21191@x2.esmtp.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160919174616.GA21191@x2.esmtp.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Received-SPF: pass (mail-1.fido.net: domain of primate.net designates 2001:470:1f04:51a::2 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:470:1f04:51a::2; envelope-from=itz@primate.net; helo=acedia.primate.net; X-SPF-Result: mail-1.fido.net: domain of primate.net designates 2001:470:1f04:51a::2 as permitted sender X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIYAKkrh5rwxlcg22BKDsrZOOCXPCA86NaNMUOKEdtvy1LIlSVjYxKd9o YFB5W5dM3eCU7hFHKMKhsTjn2LpSPx3rcxAODBZO2BOkcGk4nUtaCoFxbjkn4j2wmbuMZaTPtfvS HONLSNwM3hg96wTMCb7MuoF8+O4nOW1/LrNkEnp1u3gMPBoOkS/2keJj7H49E8qYe4reQDcpl+wi Tdhv5z1NuvM3WnCZFKZ9Q9SfYU/CAr2rlmdOUi8u9q54qTRuhXLYM3A6BXfvel8OEFDbU51GGcS0 5jgkiHUbDsEEOtjt+L+7RqYmIKy1pzAwQlJ/LOWBOXp8nHKe0R+FkIqN7hnvaGPfye0HD8TtnikE nytM9PxMY/zZGDe3cLPrK1e28YdMOxkGP0yM8z6aY72dVlGiAmsvxkPOxnV038SB0TJCttEXQn4A vqBFHAVy3LT9EYJM7yNZmUESMKRU0n44PBFP7iQrwXcopL7kWMF6SNzbBW6vVj4DtOtAs4OkWUdh 3D2pC00DYqwsVH2I0H503SeAbPoHi/zvVGAK2jvr4TbuGb+l42SKJnTkU0Z1DfAjVdNUWr05IAz4 /cTo+a/AbLE= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@master.fido.net Authentication-Results: fido.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=itz@primate.net X-FidoGuard-Class: ham X-FidoGuard-Evidence: Combined (0.15) X-Recommended-Action: accept List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users" Precedence: bulk Sender: owner-mutt-users@mutt.org X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-ID: 1bm4Rb-000742-BJ X-PlusHosting-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1.049, required 5, BAYES_05 -0.50, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.00, KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ 0.75, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1.00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.30) X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-From: owner-mutt-users-m24748@mutt.org X-Spam-Status: No X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= On 2016-09-19 10:46, Claus Assmann wrote: > So download the same mail from an archive and compare it with the > one that you have on your system. Let us know what you find. Did this with Jean-Christophe's mail early in the thread (BAD signature): http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users&m=147418223314681&q=raw No significant differences (the only difference is that the archive copy lacks a bunch of newlines at the end, but that is outside the scope of the signature anyway). -- Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups Why does the arrow on Hillary signs point to the right?