From lurker-index@localhost Wed Sep 21 11:06:51 2016 Return-Path: Received: from lin16.mojsite.com (178.218.164.164:993) by g0n.xdwgrp with IMAP4-SSL; 21 Sep 2016 09:06:51 -0000 Envelope-to: miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr Delivery-date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 05:05:18 +0200 Received: from shtjevan.gbnet.net ([194.70.142.36]:62051 helo=gbnet.net) by lin16.mojsite.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bmXqR-0008PY-Ti for miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 05:05:12 +0200 Received: (qmail 28461 invoked by uid 611); 21 Sep 2016 03:02:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 28411 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2016 03:01:18 -0000 Received: from mail-1.fido.net (84.246.192.5) by shtjevan.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 21 Sep 2016 03:01:18 -0000 Received: from disorder-1-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net ([2001:470:1f04:51a::2] helo=acedia.primate.net) by mail-1.fido.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bmXmZ-0003qX-VD for mutt-users@mutt.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 04:01:17 +0100 Received: from acedia.primate.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by acedia.primate.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-6) with ESMTPS id u8L318GE022107 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:01:09 -0700 Received: (from itz@localhost) by acedia.primate.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u8L312VW022088 for mutt-users@mutt.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:01:02 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: acedia.primate.net: itz set sender to itz@primate.net using -f Received: from [10.8.78.14] (helo=matica.foolinux.mooo.com) by ahiker.mooo.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bmXmP-0006MB-7J for mutt-users@mutt.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:01:01 -0700 Received: from itz by matica.foolinux.mooo.com with local (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bmXmO-00014N-QT for mutt-users@mutt.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:01:00 -0700 Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:01:00 -0700 From: Ian Zimmerman To: mutt-users@mutt.org Subject: Re: PGP sigs fail verification Message-ID: <20160921024026.3334.07EDFD85@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Reply-To: mutt-users@mutt.org Mail-Followup-To: mutt-users@mutt.org References: <20160917232509.GK31239@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160918051503.GO31239@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160918061803.4077.03047CF5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160919053542.13563.3494DAB5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160919103952.GA13914@x2.esmtp.org> <20160919141105.GF31779@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160919145833.uqsypbawzolll3ro@darac.org.uk> <20160919202536.GA31772@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160919225636.3870.1E81EEA4@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160919225636.3870.1E81EEA4@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Received-SPF: pass (mail-1.fido.net: domain of primate.net designates 2001:470:1f04:51a::2 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:470:1f04:51a::2; envelope-from=itz@primate.net; helo=acedia.primate.net; X-SPF-Result: mail-1.fido.net: domain of primate.net designates 2001:470:1f04:51a::2 as permitted sender X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIYAKkrh5rwxlcg22BKDsrZOOCXPCA86NaNMUOKEdtvy1LIlSVjYxKd9o YFB5W5dM3eCU7hFHKMKhsTjn2LpSPx3rcxAODBZO2BOkcGk4nUtaCoFxbjkn4j2wmbuMZaTPtfvS HONLSNwM3hg96wTMCb7MuoF8+O4nOW1/LrNkEnp1u3gMPBoOkS/2keJj7H49E8qYe4reQDcpl+wi Tdhv5z19VHSTVsdhwqT70LzNUWhevaaPrHtfL6LUpK1batoMJXLYM3A6BXfvel8OEFDbU51GGcS0 5jgkiHUbDsEEOtjt+L+7RqYmIKy1pzAwQlJ/LOWBOXp8nHKe0R+FkIqN7hnvaGPfye0HD8TtnikE nytM9PxMY/zZGDe3cLPrK1e28YdMOxkGP0yM8z6aY72dVlGiAmsvxkPOxnV038SB0TJCttEXQn4A vqBFHAVy3LT9EYJM7yNZmUESMKRU0n44PBFP7iQrwXcopL7kWMF6SNzbBW6vVj4DtOtAs4OkWUdh 3D2pC00DYqwsVH2I0H503SeAbPoHi/zvVGAK2jvr4TbuGb+l42SKJnTkU0Z1DfAjVdNUWr05IAz4 /cTo+a/AbLE= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@master.fido.net Authentication-Results: fido.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=itz@primate.net X-FidoGuard-Class: ham X-FidoGuard-Evidence: Combined (0.15) X-Recommended-Action: accept List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users" Precedence: bulk Sender: owner-mutt-users@mutt.org X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-ID: 1bmXqR-0008PY-Ti X-PlusHosting-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-5.549, required 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -5.00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.00, KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ 0.75, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1.00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.30) X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-From: owner-mutt-users-m24756@mutt.org X-Spam-Status: No X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= On 2016-09-19 16:15, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > For my part I now think this is a flea. There must be more than one thing going on :( I did the manual gpg test on multiple mails, this time properly massaging them into the RFC 3156 format. In most cases, mutt and gpg actually agree: both say BAD, or both say GOOD. There is one exception, though: Miro's original message in which this thread is rooted. That one verifies OK through manual gpg, but mutt says BAD. So, there's a flea, but there's also a bug :( Can the house experts comment on this - Patrick, Erik, Cameron? Does sig verification just work for you? Here are the mailing list messages I tested: mutt gpg http://marc.info/?l=gentoo-user&m=147435795624410&q=raw GOOD GOOD http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users&m=147420131617997&q=raw GOOD GOOD http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users&m=147417425713497&q=raw BAD GOOD http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users&m=147418223314681&q=raw BAD BAD http://marc.info/?l=gentoo-user&m=147421675920866&q=raw BAD BAD I conjecture that the BAD result in the case of Jean-Christophe's message, #4 above, results from him inserting a non-standard X- header in the signed MIME part. I don't have an explanation for the other BAD results. -- Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups Why does the arrow on Hillary signs point to the right?