From lurker-index@localhost Wed Sep 21 11:06:52 2016 Return-Path: Received: from lin16.mojsite.com (178.218.164.164:993) by g0n.xdwgrp with IMAP4-SSL; 21 Sep 2016 09:06:52 -0000 Envelope-to: miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr Delivery-date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 08:16:36 +0200 Received: from shtjevan.gbnet.net ([194.70.142.36]:34418 helo=gbnet.net) by lin16.mojsite.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bmapb-0002wr-18 for miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 08:16:31 +0200 Received: (qmail 5898 invoked by uid 611); 21 Sep 2016 06:13:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 5861 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2016 06:12:24 -0000 Received: from davin.gbnet.net (194.70.142.37) by shtjevan.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 21 Sep 2016 06:12:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 10643 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2016 06:12:20 -0000 Received: from mail-1.fido.net (84.246.192.5) by davin.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 21 Sep 2016 06:12:20 -0000 Received: from schplaf.org ([80.67.188.118] helo=morgoth.schplaf.org) by mail-1.fido.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bmalV-0001yj-RF for mutt-users@mutt.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 07:12:19 +0100 Received: by morgoth.schplaf.org (Postfix, from userid 5002) id 2FF0328B; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 08:04:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on morgoth.schplaf.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0, No Received: from minitel.priv.enst-bretagne.fr (salsa-09.enst-bretagne.fr [192.108.116.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: slash) by morgoth.schplaf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DDD1CDB for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 08:04:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 08:02:57 +0200 From: Jean-Christophe Bach To: mutt-users@mutt.org Message-ID: <20160921060257.GB29391@minitel.priv.enst-bretagne.fr> References: <20160917232509.GK31239@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160918051503.GO31239@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160918061803.4077.03047CF5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160919053542.13563.3494DAB5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160919103952.GA13914@x2.esmtp.org> <20160919141105.GF31779@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160919145833.uqsypbawzolll3ro@darac.org.uk> <20160919202536.GA31772@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160919225636.3870.1E81EEA4@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160921024026.3334.07EDFD85@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160921024026.3334.07EDFD85@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIdbPuQjQhlEHM2e+a3MZ8ctbZUwvO9wqRY4OgelZCK5cx1wTMkEUUoeb KIhkyzl2dMyHM/lQINdtG8vrH1tD/1GHchG7UCGe+hbk6hFMPZazrhTg/4q2QU37a0WxDeSOQqEi O55Lt1OfX4Q2NNU2iRID/AGC3RFugPW11HIScqQgISimHpAo9jO+doIgCqhbv80cQ7TzWVkvMdTO N8QtRZ0ccBIk1Sag4dKiqCrF8eZZBk6HpfuyBvXsTkPMT38gZ8dRwT5c0pI1Go+Ti1E5LF7i3h3w mAJHhB5TDWVnLs8FFpmtMuO56q7BznSN6SugFMOpyKA69LF1Ge2GaGfxmfrQuMYAAwF5f/XA3e/q xFlkeyNAu+TGy4S13Qpcc/K5CGReSdkbj51gB8ZMj8t/+kHPaHMyqcul/+IgNy0t/W2ylnEaTdft T8Kul6ZpNgSqNH06rIM6ClqDToHTLIJs0/eIwLzRWNJ5cyPxQaCa99or/cuW/PWBpXnkmCA6bOjS sG6FRHh5k0PrubRSCSbv0dc= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@master.fido.net Subject: =?utf-8?b?W1NQQU0/XQ==?= Re: PGP sigs fail verification X-FidoGuard-Class: unsure X-FidoGuard-Evidence: Combined (0.80) X-Recommended-Action: accept List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users" Precedence: bulk Sender: owner-mutt-users@mutt.org X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-ID: 1bmapb-0002wr-18 X-PlusHosting-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-6.299, required 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -5.00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.00, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1.00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.30) X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-From: owner-mutt-users-m24758@mutt.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= --DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Hello, > I conjecture that the BAD result in the case of Jean-Christophe's > message, #4 above, results from him inserting a non-standard X- header > in the signed MIME part. I don't have an explanation for the other BAD > results. OK, I try without any custom header (this email). I removed all my_hdr fields to try. Note that this email is sent from another computer than the previous one (dev-libs/libgcrypt-1.7.3, mail-client/mutt-1.5.24-r2, app-crypt/gnupg-2.1.14-r1). Before sending this email, I have checked by sending one to myself: the sig appears to be GOOD. Regards, JC --DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJX4iKMAAoJEOkyS97BJP8no3gQAJyYbsAN2+Bh6zyTDulNAyUj qmmnxJyfvhsNt3HIrBCJB95p5pUFGbUwpGc0FekLukxB68JAYLiApin8yRRTvwrR wS9R0J/Q0FyPbylL0Tt215A7Z8RQFMPTisryCl/JDmiQWJXkEcKQT5a7kI8p/6Nx b0tw1ctIsAz1E7XJCkl/FYByQ5u/Dewc9Njxyo/an8cMON30FatqPb5d8lGr6azP XfVtMyQrT/70swvhQzafaarxF9M/fmy1ecGwEkbwUf7A4WKErPZP2LDXfVpqZRzL dqD2iLvah+CvvVRNdFk/V444+yzTNHFQDY2dSFu7AJLiS3eeCnPhQQ5t5izBPpc2 +iPCedYA7t9fTUN1GtTGyOhCLl+VXTqkGU616YPNXCENERs0uHEL4o2L0ZtZspV6 wH0FCwcVurhCf9pouPg0Xg4BK/2aWcB/7XjmvjaJeLGdhZC+wsRym/kFU3TCDziB clI45xncnM9z7gbAQCdrguqLofhQJi/xHn3ffU5uCtbUbDGmynknXOKbIJr//hHC hWpksREggBnNSKuH7qqZki/nEnNKVITQED9oguF/YwEzgGtjG2czYhCGdiKhvO8Z nyrE/EoDp7LRsWy7qli1+U7QsNwLRGJWZ9iFGEhPpn9S/hHDCtE3f6vbh/auvLdC bwpJopbfm4hNZzO12VHE =pqYJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M--