From lurker-index@localhost Fri Sep 23 08:06:16 2016 Return-Path: Received: from lin16.mojsite.com (178.218.164.164:993) by g0n.xdwgrp with IMAP4-SSL; 23 Sep 2016 06:06:16 -0000 Envelope-to: miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr Delivery-date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 23:37:37 +0200 Received: from shtjevan.gbnet.net ([194.70.142.36]:62925 helo=gbnet.net) by lin16.mojsite.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bmpCu-0004yA-4X for miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 23:37:32 +0200 Received: (qmail 24894 invoked by uid 611); 21 Sep 2016 21:34:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 24888 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2016 21:33:44 -0000 Received: from davin.gbnet.net (194.70.142.37) by shtjevan.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 21 Sep 2016 21:33:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 6792 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2016 21:33:43 -0000 Received: from mail-1.fido.net (84.246.192.5) by davin.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 21 Sep 2016 21:33:43 -0000 Received: from isaac.pizzashack.org ([72.249.127.164] helo=isaac.dragontoe.org) by mail-1.fido.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bmp99-0008Vt-R5 for mutt-users@mutt.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 22:33:43 +0100 Received: from isaac.dragontoe.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by isaac.dragontoe.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u8LLWaPl026673; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 16:32:36 -0500 Received: (from ddm@localhost) by isaac.dragontoe.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id u8LLWaKx026671; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 16:32:36 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 16:32:36 -0500 From: Derek Martin To: Ben McGinnes Cc: mutt-users@mutt.org Subject: Re: [SPAM?] Re: OT: Miro's PGP signature [Was: urlview not listing the links right] Message-ID: <20160921213236.GD24944@dragontoe.org> Reply-To: mutt-users@mutt.org Mail-Followup-To: Ben McGinnes , mutt-users@mutt.org References: <20160917232509.GK31239@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160918051503.GO31239@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160918061803.4077.03047CF5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160918064328.ts37vzdr6ehds6ln@lovelace.schplaf> <20160921104046.GD1147@adversary.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vOmOzSkFvhd7u8Ms" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160921104046.GD1147@adversary.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIQ5LMN3e8JN1d7MuaRyQ6woXXLOhwIqe1/i0mugVeahjwS9kmloc0QPc 6NojePGshKoX6cf48nMRi11DeAO1wcs3F2WGI+GlCQcyYzp2Wi50etP+kqgO0RobYnu/vqiZ0EcU 5a4u/wPhG0sm1zHbIeAmGLtjG0Rftib/QiTvsgg/WdX6G5kxkHMOsp98WrwwPgZvGHVrWAsQ20WH /uRE/IhsB7NTn3AUaQxAniEXSJbvZuM7jUXIESohoO51xWmU8aY4tVHuHWnGFjG3r8VaKWLDt/kL DTVwkPJ1sOR7DRqWeujZeigI5EIHJfXguX/kemFUb7kVjc19kWlEf2xIwZx+pvlHhV6a5QjptwQB GybQxnnAH6IQWRi2VxA1NON6vbNUKRLLf7sFWSBx6bUK4BtnpUCc/7ZYWCbLYqCDCvJl8ZNbIqSX wyPRSbQVdDMYSWn7LBlKwOgtOsoSbpAc2Mwnhv51kKrHEH9Ad6t3+QRJcxw3qqhc+N6cuEg4XWh5 FlgMdhpi/rh6U8RYMF2s5Rnj12ttcLUmPxYMfpiai3XT X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@master.fido.net X-FidoGuard-Class: ham X-FidoGuard-Evidence: Combined (0.26) X-Recommended-Action: accept List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users" Precedence: bulk Sender: owner-mutt-users@mutt.org X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-ID: 1bmpCu-0004yA-4X X-PlusHosting-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-6.299, required 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -5.00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.00, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1.00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.30) X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-From: owner-mutt-users-m24767@mutt.org X-Spam-Status: No X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= --vOmOzSkFvhd7u8Ms Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 08:40:46PM +1000, Ben McGinnes wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 08:43:28AM +0200, Jean-Christophe Bach wrote: > > Hello, > >=20 > > > Can anyone else verify Miro's signature? I'm getting "BAD signature" > > > both in mutt, and when I extract the signed part and try to verify it > > > with gpg from the command line. > > >=20 > > > mutt 1.5.24, gpg 2.0.28, libgcrypt 1.7.3. I have some vague recollection that GPG 2 versions might have some difference that can trigger this... I was experiencing a problem in the past where people told me some of my messages didn't verify, and IIRC it had something to do with compatibility and GPG versions. I just can't remember the details. However the conversation happened on-list, so some enterprising person could likely find it in the archives. > > > This just happened to me on another mailing list too, so I strongly > > > suspect it is me and not the senders. > >=20 > > The signature appears as BAD here too (with mutt-1.7.0-r4, gnupg-2.0.28, > > libgcrypt 1.7.3). >=20 > All four of Miro's sigs were fine for me. Yours, however, wasn't. FWIW, for me, every message in this thread that carried a signature verified correctly. I'm currently running mutt-1.5.21 with gpg-1.4.5. I should really update those... =3D8^) --=20 Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result= in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience. --vOmOzSkFvhd7u8Ms Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFX4vxzHEnASN++rQIRAoOVAJkBcOn0RG8ZIRrC5zWTs1IQ7vh0FQCeNQDX poTj3MQBeWvgDohOKKWPhQ0= =t4Qr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vOmOzSkFvhd7u8Ms--