From lurker-index@localhost Fri Sep 23 08:06:23 2016 Return-Path: Received: from lin16.mojsite.com (178.218.164.164:993) by g0n.xdwgrp with IMAP4-SSL; 23 Sep 2016 06:06:23 -0000 Envelope-to: miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr Delivery-date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:42:13 +0200 Received: from shtjevan.gbnet.net ([194.70.142.36]:35091 helo=gbnet.net) by lin16.mojsite.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bnCgy-0003Nu-H6 for miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:42:08 +0200 Received: (qmail 24038 invoked by uid 611); 22 Sep 2016 22:39:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 18458 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2016 22:12:44 -0000 Received: from davin.gbnet.net (194.70.142.37) by shtjevan.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 22 Sep 2016 22:12:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 17240 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2016 21:19:48 -0000 Received: from mail-1.fido.net (84.246.192.5) by davin.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 22 Sep 2016 21:19:48 -0000 Received: from isaac.pizzashack.org ([72.249.127.164] helo=isaac.dragontoe.org) by mail-1.fido.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bnBPD-0000qN-KR for mutt-users@mutt.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 22:19:48 +0100 Received: from isaac.dragontoe.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by isaac.dragontoe.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u8MLIf1V002414 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:18:41 -0500 Received: (from ddm@localhost) by isaac.dragontoe.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id u8MLIfhs002412 for mutt-users@mutt.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:18:41 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:18:41 -0500 From: Derek Martin To: mutt-users@mutt.org Subject: Re: [SPAM?] Re: OT: Miro's PGP signature [Was: urlview not listing the links right] Message-ID: <20160922211841.GA2162@dragontoe.org> Reply-To: mutt-users@mutt.org Mail-Followup-To: mutt-users@mutt.org References: <20160917232509.GK31239@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160918051503.GO31239@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160918061803.4077.03047CF5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160918064328.ts37vzdr6ehds6ln@lovelace.schplaf> <20160921104046.GD1147@adversary.org> <20160921213236.GD24944@dragontoe.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160921213236.GD24944@dragontoe.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIQ5LMN3e8JN1d7MuaRyQ6woXXLOhwIqe1/i0mugVeahjwS9kmloc0QPc 6NojePGshKoX6cf48nMRi11DeAO1wcs3F2WGI+GlCQcyYzp2Wi50etP+kqgO0RobYnu/vqiZ0EcU 5a4u/wPhG0sm1zHbIeAmGLtjG0Rftib/QiTvsgg/WdX6G5kxkHMOsp98WrwwPpPfnij50edt+qPO QlLvbgHKKsp7WVYeh3XNNmrO3hryZuM7jUXIESohoO51xWmU8aY4tVHuHWnGFjG3r8VaKWLDt/kL DTVwkPJ1sOR7DRqWeujZeigI5EIHJfXguX/kemFUb7kVjc19kWlEf2xIwZx+pvlHhV6a5QjptwQB GybQxnnAH6IQWRi2VxA1NON6vbNUKRLLf7sFWSBx6bUK4BtnpUCc/7ZYWCbLYqCDCvJl8ZNbIqSX wyPRSbQVdDMYSWn7LBlKwOgtOsoSbpAc2Mwnhv51kKrHEH9Ad6t3+QRJcxw3qqhc+N6cuEg4XWh5 FlgMdhpi/rh6U8RYMF2s5Rnj12ttcLUmPxYMfpiai3XT X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@master.fido.net X-FidoGuard-Class: ham X-FidoGuard-Evidence: Combined (0.27) X-Recommended-Action: accept List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users" Precedence: bulk Sender: owner-mutt-users@mutt.org X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-ID: 1bnCgy-0003Nu-H6 X-PlusHosting-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-6.299, required 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -5.00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.00, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1.00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.30) X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-From: owner-mutt-users-m24776@mutt.org X-Spam-Status: No X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 04:32:36PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > > All four of Miro's sigs were fine for me. Yours, however, wasn't. >=20 > FWIW, for me, every message in this thread that carried a signature > verified correctly. I'm currently running mutt-1.5.21 with gpg-1.4.5. > I should really update those... =3D8^) OK, I lied. All of the signatures were good except for two messages =66rom Jean-Christophe: =20 20160921191202.GB18462@lovelace.schplaf 20160921195336.GD18462@lovelace.schplaf Both of those were bad. The first of his was good: 20160921060257.GB29391@minitel.priv.enst-bretagne.fr --=20 Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result= in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience. --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFX5EqxHEnASN++rQIRAvWeAJ9Kh+oBKrIyXQidv33lCva54TehNwCeMHH5 msrLCsFYF1Rd1nTFt1iRgC4= =f4Tm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU--