From lurker-index@localhost Fri Sep 23 08:06:23 2016 Return-Path: Received: from lin16.mojsite.com (178.218.164.164:993) by g0n.xdwgrp with IMAP4-SSL; 23 Sep 2016 06:06:23 -0000 Envelope-to: miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr Delivery-date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:38:21 +0200 Received: from shtjevan.gbnet.net ([194.70.142.36]:33709 helo=gbnet.net) by lin16.mojsite.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bnCdE-0002vM-1G for miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:38:16 +0200 Received: (qmail 22299 invoked by uid 611); 22 Sep 2016 22:35:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 18797 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2016 22:17:04 -0000 Received: from mail-1.fido.net (84.246.192.5) by shtjevan.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 22 Sep 2016 22:17:04 -0000 Received: from infra.glanzmann.de ([88.198.249.254]) by mail-1.fido.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bnCIg-0005SO-FZ for mutt-users@mutt.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 23:17:04 +0100 Received: by infra.glanzmann.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C8DC327D0C3B; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:17:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:17:00 +0200 From: Thomas Glanzmann To: mutt-users@mutt.org Subject: Re: PGP sigs fail verification Message-ID: <20160922221700.GC4573@glanzmann.de> Mail-Followup-To: mutt-users@mutt.org References: <20160919202536.GA31772@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160919225636.3870.1E81EEA4@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160921024026.3334.07EDFD85@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160921060257.GB29391@minitel.priv.enst-bretagne.fr> <20160921065025.6939.1A051757@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160921191202.GB18462@lovelace.schplaf> <20160921193520.GA20438@x2.esmtp.org> <20160921195336.GD18462@lovelace.schplaf> <20160922090844.GC12629@glanzmann.de> <20160922111931.GA28708@x2.esmtp.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160922111931.GA28708@x2.esmtp.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) Received-SPF: pass (mail-1.fido.net: domain of glanzmann.de designates 88.198.249.254 as permitted sender) client-ip=88.198.249.254; envelope-from=thomas@glanzmann.de; helo=infra.glanzmann.de; X-SPF-Result: mail-1.fido.net: domain of glanzmann.de designates 88.198.249.254 as permitted sender X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIUZfs1/bqjmEAgqjle5UxOkf/s6GI7oMfIoxPsvys7w1x1wTMkEUUoeb KIhkyzl2dMyHM/lQINdtG8vrH1tD/1GHchG7UCGe+hbk6hFMPZaz+PGff+YzYL5j20ags2UEhvQ3 aVvVbHgSqYpWl2k8PuWlf9FHzkAWuSdBA6ZpRK+22EpgsNVL5BgQIkhMwiP8i6tlJlV31ZMtlXRW 6uv989gx8uenWHC+popoAwPMw1bc7lDwqaQOWRlSg/1m7nfKVSeZ7vQqiw2+Ng8fcUHlhO+8Ksk+ aedMfNWSnJswrtlNphw+9yLPRnj8MoMncKDE3aVrGDz6PnwUs7/50x+FT2mE2Fy427Aqdw9b+hnB VDzn4x7VJsG1z7fwBj6TyuxmwWYzx2Zgyhf3OXiddZgacWcqisd0GE7I1qIKXMSYcetTUZ3ArJZr 8KAmKMKm2/6jAJxR5cqw1hyurD74/Y2jaauzHfq9G+e73agzxG1MsCE16J1fhOzjF0b4LXcjJZ5l oohsN4BKV+zjdY/nbor+5wdxTI5cnz3CwDo6ZaB1y7cr X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@master.fido.net Authentication-Results: fido.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=thomas@glanzmann.de X-FidoGuard-Class: ham X-FidoGuard-Evidence: Combined (0.24) X-Recommended-Action: accept List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users" Precedence: bulk Sender: owner-mutt-users@mutt.org X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-ID: 1bnCdE-0002vM-1G X-PlusHosting-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.799, required 5, BAYES_00 -5.00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.00, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1.00, KAM_LINKBAIT 2.50, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.30) X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-From: owner-mutt-users-m24775@mutt.org X-Spam-Status: No X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= Hello Claus, * Claus Assmann [2016-09-22 13:26]: > Did you see my mail about removing the X-Header from the first part? no I didn't. Which specific header you're talking about? However it seems that you have figured it out and that a patch will be made ready soon. Cheers, Thomas