From lurker-index@localhost Fri Sep 23 15:11:55 2016 Return-Path: Received: from lin16.mojsite.com (178.218.164.164:993) by g0n.xdwgrp with IMAP4-SSL; 23 Sep 2016 13:11:55 -0000 Envelope-to: miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr Delivery-date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 08:53:51 +0200 Received: from shtjevan.gbnet.net ([194.70.142.36]:57862 helo=gbnet.net) by lin16.mojsite.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bnKMj-0007gR-VT for miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 08:53:46 +0200 Received: (qmail 10045 invoked by uid 611); 23 Sep 2016 06:50:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 10013 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2016 06:50:00 -0000 Received: from mail-1.fido.net (84.246.192.5) by shtjevan.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 23 Sep 2016 06:50:00 -0000 Received: from disorder-1-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net ([2001:470:1f04:51a::2] helo=acedia.primate.net) by mail-1.fido.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bnKIz-0002PT-SM for mutt-users@mutt.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 07:50:00 +0100 Received: from acedia.primate.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by acedia.primate.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-6) with ESMTPS id u8N6niB6005745 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 23:49:49 -0700 Received: (from itz@localhost) by acedia.primate.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u8N6ndtU005736 for mutt-users@mutt.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 23:49:39 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: acedia.primate.net: itz set sender to itz@primate.net using -f Received: from [10.8.78.14] (helo=matica.foolinux.mooo.com) by ahiker.mooo.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bnKIj-0001LH-JN for mutt-users@mutt.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 23:49:37 -0700 Received: from itz by matica.foolinux.mooo.com with local (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bnKIj-0007OL-EA for mutt-users@mutt.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 23:49:37 -0700 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 23:49:37 -0700 From: Ian Zimmerman To: mutt-users@mutt.org Subject: Re: New thread about PGP sigs, part 1: Mutt disagrees with gpg Message-ID: <20160923064459.28283.24B8A4FD@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Reply-To: mutt-users@mutt.org Mail-Followup-To: mutt-users@mutt.org References: <20160922214620.GA4059@matica> <20160922235327.GA24981@x2.esmtp.org> <20160923020321.19992.1D0420CA@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160923030146.GA5094@x2.esmtp.org> <20160923054939.26688.09B7716A@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160923054939.26688.09B7716A@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Received-SPF: pass (mail-1.fido.net: domain of primate.net designates 2001:470:1f04:51a::2 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:470:1f04:51a::2; envelope-from=itz@primate.net; helo=acedia.primate.net; X-SPF-Result: mail-1.fido.net: domain of primate.net designates 2001:470:1f04:51a::2 as permitted sender X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIYAKkrh5rwxlcg22BKDsrZOOCXPCA86NaNMUOKEdtvy1LIlSVjYxKd9o YFB5W5dM3eCU7hFHKMKhsTjn2LpSPx3rcxAODBZO2BOkcGk4nUtaCoFxbjkn4j2wmbuMZaTPtfvS HONLSNwM3hg96wTMCb7MuoF8+O4nOW1/LrNkEnp1u3gMPBoOkS/2keJj7H49E8qYe4reQDcpl+wi Tdhv5z3IUR//CJNvMSiAOn0+eBvf9dUJwYFhd+iG6yZELHltU3LYM3A6BXfvel8OEFDbU51GGcS0 5jgkiHUbDsEEOtjt+L+7RqYmIKy1pzAwQlJ/LOWBOXp8nHKe0R+FkIqN7hnvaGPfye0HD8TtnikE nytM9PxMY/zZGDe3cLPrK1e28YdMOxkGP0yM8z6aY72dVlGiAmsvxkPOxnV038SB0TJCttEXQn4A vqBFHAVy3LT9EYJM7yNZmUESMKRU0n44PBFP7iQrwXcopL7kWMF6SNzbBW6vVj4DtOtAs4OkWUdh 3D2pC00DYqwsVH2I0H503SeAbPoHi/zvVGAK2jvr4TbuGb+l42SKJnTkU0Z1DfAjVdNUWr05IAz4 /cTo+a/AbLE= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@master.fido.net Authentication-Results: fido.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=itz@primate.net X-FidoGuard-Class: ham X-FidoGuard-Evidence: Combined (0.15) X-Recommended-Action: accept List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users" Precedence: bulk Sender: owner-mutt-users@mutt.org X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-ID: 1bnKMj-0007gR-VT X-PlusHosting-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-5.549, required 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -5.00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.00, KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ 0.75, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1.00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.30) X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-From: owner-mutt-users-m24783@mutt.org X-Spam-Status: No X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= On 2016-09-22 23:02, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > I have to declare mutt innocent in this instance. What happened was > that something in the transit or delivery path applied the following > transformations: > > 1. Where a leading dot was QP-encoded as =2E, unapplied the encoding and > changed it into a literal dot. > > 2. Reflowed binary base-64 encoded parts from 72 chars per line to 60. > > It is not surprising that the signature no longer matches after these > changes :-) And now I found another similar case: http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users&m=147458400528234&q=raw Here, my copy has the leading "=66rom" decoded into "from", and the trailing ": =20" encoded (!) into ":=20=20". GRRR. I know there's sendmail (the real thing, but the latest version) in the path between the list server and me. Is sendmail known for such tricks? -- Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups Why does the arrow on Hillary signs point to the right?