From lurker-index@localhost Fri Sep 23 16:47:11 2016 Return-Path: Received: from lin16.mojsite.com (178.218.164.164:993) by g0n.xdwgrp with IMAP4-SSL; 23 Sep 2016 14:47:11 -0000 Envelope-to: miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr Delivery-date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 16:30:10 +0200 Received: from shtjevan.gbnet.net ([194.70.142.36]:46416 helo=gbnet.net) by lin16.mojsite.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bnRUK-0006g8-Bt for miro.rovis@croatiafidelis.hr; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 16:30:04 +0200 Received: (qmail 3728 invoked by uid 611); 23 Sep 2016 14:26:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 22727 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2016 11:24:11 -0000 Received: from mail-1.fido.net (84.246.192.5) by shtjevan.gbnet.net with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 23 Sep 2016 11:24:11 -0000 Received: from zardoc.esmtp.org ([70.36.157.240]) by mail-1.fido.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bnOaN-0001R7-CA for mutt-users@mutt.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 12:24:10 +0100 Received: from x2.esmtp.org (localhost. [127.0.0.1]) by zardoc.esmtp.org (MeTA1-1.1.Alpha6.0) with ESMTPS (TLS=TLSv1.2, cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384, bits=256, verify=OK) id S000000000020EFCB00; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 04:24:03 -0700 Received: (from ca@localhost) by x2.esmtp.org (8.14.6/8.12.10.Beta0/Submit) id u8NBO3nq008848 for mutt-users@mutt.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 04:24:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 04:24:03 -0700 From: Claus Assmann To: mutt-users@mutt.org Subject: Re: PGP sigs fail verification: X- header Message-ID: <20160923112403.GA15628@x2.esmtp.org> Reply-To: mutt-users@mutt.org Mail-Followup-To: mutt-users@mutt.org References: <20160917232509.GK31239@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160918051503.GO31239@g0n.xdwgrp> <20160918061803.4077.03047CF5@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160918064328.ts37vzdr6ehds6ln@lovelace.schplaf> <20160921104046.GD1147@adversary.org> <20160921213236.GD24944@dragontoe.org> <20160922211841.GA2162@dragontoe.org> <20160923071402.GE8526@minitel.priv.enst-bretagne.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160923071402.GE8526@minitel.priv.enst-bretagne.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24+24 (4de4b3635140) (2015-08-30) X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIZkPdBLoI4rpXXVukOUKyiwMVK2FFy+TmYeRnjy88I2+Wywi3RPeT3mN b5O6yuT+gUzCN0WZSl7cguNkLbh+Ux309qCWqNzocZwcIGp6lcxjZuB+2KJsO3GXVz1P8nrkgH/Y OtGqTc2vmMYcR172Ttilf9FHzkAWuSdBA6ZpRK+22EpgsNVL5BgQIkhMwiP8i0CdvEStl09J7hjz ZpTBNOtEE8o4D5x62+Qrf3nQ6QnvCPDKTo6I/NU7fcDpocXu30WEJkIe7Jsq+y0ys/Cptw493SsS 4aMXJmiJ2G0eb5ahfy36Q0y4/ZIEpZ88QYwZ3dh9k/7+ezSIkKvuiCmTMO+fisJCU7/dqfyyzLJt i/St7g6G2ujZu0ohb8Ar3zd3CjHYLyvT6f3Q+BmtUtn7AtuSI+TcSDcfdFUrIheeFYvGqwDRBfGc CitSyoubPUw2INkjyzby4idWI9QDpJuVzLDOJQqAY3yHWg7XcwqMuTIFpl8rF453rlG/1n4zSXbJ j8Z5HU9lWzY9IEW/lO31ercxL7hrJSk60SF3F6RYOYr2 X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@master.fido.net X-FidoGuard-Class: ham X-FidoGuard-Evidence: Combined (0.20) X-Recommended-Action: accept List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users" Precedence: bulk Sender: owner-mutt-users@mutt.org X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-ID: 1bnRUK-0006g8-Bt X-PlusHosting-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-6.299, required 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -5.00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.00, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1.00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.30) X-PlusHosting-MailScanner-From: owner-mutt-users-m24790@mutt.org X-Spam-Status: No X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= On Fri, Sep 23, 2016, Jean-Christophe Bach wrote: [removed the annoying and bogus [spam] tag] > Exactly, the main difference is the fact I did not use the same computer > to send the emails. In both cases, I have custom headers (for instance > this email should also have custom headers). I did tests with my Your mail again failed to verify for me due to your X-... header: --FN+gV9K+162wdwwF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Does your mail verify for you (or others) (after you received it back from the list)? If so, with which setup? And what does mutt use as body for gpg --verify? Does it include your X-... header?